Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.2d 673 · 1970
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 914
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simmons v. United States · Marshall v. United States · Craft v. United States · Borchert v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"While we do not condone the practice, followed in this case, of attempting to influence a witness’s recollection by displaying to her a photograph of appellant immediately prior to testifying, we hold that the admission of the identification testimony on the record before us, did not, in any way, affect the substantial rights of the appellant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.