Koufakis v. Carvel’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.2d 892 · 1970
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co. (1982), Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (1977)
63 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Moore v. New York Cotton Exchange · Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp. · General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · Walker v. Sheldon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and virtuous man of modest resources against a powerful and unscrupulous man of untold wealth, and remarked frequently that the defendant had failed to testify. Id. at 902.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A mistrial should have been declared on account of these remarks [suggesting that the defendant should respond in damages because it was rich and the plaintiff poor].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.