United States v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.3d 1061 · 2005
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Arnold (2007), United States v. Hale (2006)
24 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Cotton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"the government need only show that it took reasonable precautions to preserve the original condition of the evidence, it does not have to exclude all possibilities of tampering with the evidence.... [a] presumption of regularity exists with respect to official acts of public officers and, absent any evidence to the contrary, the court presumes that their official duties have been discharged properly."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCoy“The standard for the admission of exhibits into evidence is that there must be a showing that the physical exhibit being offered is in substantially the same condition as when the crime was committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCoy“go to the weight of the evidence rather than its admissibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McCoy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.