Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 F.3d 1263 - Stockman's Water Company Llc v. Vaca Partners Lp Llc

Stockman's Water Company Llc v. Vaca Partners Lp Llc’s Empirical Analysis

425 F.3d 1263 · 2005

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably McBeth v. Himes (2010), Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc. (2013)

6 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

160200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner · Old Republic Insurance Company v. Durango Air Service Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ourts entering a Rule 54(b) certification should 'clearly articulate their reasons and make careful statements based on the record supporting their determination of "finality”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “expressfiy] determine that there is no just reason for delay” and”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When an action presents more than one claim for relief — whether as a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim— or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay. Otherwise, any order or other decision, however designated, that adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights of fewer than all the parties does not end the action as to any of the claims or parties and may be revised at any time before the entry of a judgment adjudicating all the claims and all the parties’ rights and liabilities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.