Tabaku v. Gonzales’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.3d 417 · 2005
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Zadvydas v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot uphold credibility assessments unmoored from the record, based on nothing but the IJ's personal speculation or conjecture.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we will not automatically yield to the immigration judge's conclusions when they are drawn from insufficient or incomplete evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Giday v. Gonzales“we are not inclined to defer to [that finding] on this remaining sixth ground alone”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.