United States v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.3d 482 · 2005
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on United States v. Booker · Florida v. Jimeno · United States v. Paladino · United States v. Lee · United States v. Torres
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The scope of consent is 'limited by the breadth of actual consent, and whether the search remained within the boundaries of the consent is a question of fact to be determined from the totality of all the circumstances.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“After Booker, all sentences, including those that are above or below the range that the guidelines would advise ( i.e., those that we would have described as the result of `departures' in the pre- Booker world), are to be reviewed for reasonableness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[m]ilitary, civic, charitable, or public service; employment-related contributions; and similar prior good works”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.