Jackson v. Roe’s Empirical Analysis
425 F.3d 654 · 2005
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably 55 Cal. 4th 428 - In re Reno (2012), Allen v. Ornoski (2006)
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Rose v. Lundy · Royall · Rhines v. Weber · Carey Warden v. Saffold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determines there was good cause for the petitioner's failure to exhaust his claims first in state court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e hold that the application of an “extraordinary circumstances” standard does not comport with the “good cause” standard prescribed by Rhines. See NLRB v. Zeno Table Co., 610 F.2d 567, 569 (9th Cir.1979) (distinguishing between the “good cause” standard found in NLRB regulations and the “extraordinary circumstances” standard in section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act and noting that “ ‘good cause’ ... appears to be less stringent than ... ‘extraordinary circumstances’ ”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it likely would be an abuse of discretion for a district court to deny a stay and to dismiss a mixed petition if the petitioner had good cause for his failure to exhaust, his unexhausted claims are potentially meritorious, and there is no indication that the petitioner engaged in intentionally dilatory litigation tactics.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sadowski v. Grounds
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.