Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 F.3d 964 - Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC

Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

425 F.3d 964 · 2005

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
July 2025
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County School Board (2009), Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley (2011)

11 federal appellate ·

280200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Mobile Gas Service Corporation · Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co. · At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board · Piambino v. Bailey · Transmission Access Policy Study Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) that irreparable injury will be suffered unless the injunction is issued; (3) the threatened injury to the moving party outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction might cause the non-moving party; and (4) if issued, the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The courts of appeals (other than the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States, the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. The jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall be limited to the jurisdiction described in sections 1292(c) and (d) and 1295 of this title.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.