Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 F.3d 99 - Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corp.

Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

425 F.3d 99 · 2005

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Hickman v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends . . . (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and (3) a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “accepting as true all facts alleged in the complaint and drawing all inferences in favor of the plaintiff,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.