Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

425 F. App'x 223

Joyner v. Ozmint

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2011

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-04-28

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2014

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-04-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Benjamin Anthony Joyner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Joyner v. Ozmint, No. 3:09-cv-02524-DCN, 2010 WL 3783167 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2010); (Sept. 23, 2010; Nov. 3, 2010). We deny Joyner’s motions to appoint counsel and for transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/425/fappx/223 · .json · Public domain