Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 FSUPP 373 - McQueen v. Swenson

McQueen v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1981
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden · Houser v. United States · Thomas v. Wyrick · McQueen v. State · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the somewhat common practice for skilled practitioners not to take state criminal witnesses' depositions; trial tactics in waiting for the prosecutor to put on his case and not alerting him as to the defense; and finally, the strength of the state's case against McQueen and the weakness of McQueen's defense. Following the foregoing discussion the district court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “makes an express finding that the ineffective assistance of counsel rendered petitioner, did not prejudice his right to a fair trial, and more certainly, did not reach constitutional inadequacy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was hardly needed by an alleged assailant some sixty-five pounds heavier than his target. It had no”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.