McQueen v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 1981
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Roger Lee McQueen v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden · Houser v. United States · Thomas v. Wyrick · McQueen v. State · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the somewhat common practice for skilled practitioners not to take state criminal witnesses' depositions; trial tactics in waiting for the prosecutor to put on his case and not alerting him as to the defense; and finally, the strength of the state's case against McQueen and the weakness of McQueen's defense. Following the foregoing discussion the district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McQueen v. Swenson“makes an express finding that the ineffective assistance of counsel rendered petitioner, did not prejudice his right to a fair trial, and more certainly, did not reach constitutional inadequacy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McQueen v. Swenson“was hardly needed by an alleged assailant some sixty-five pounds heavier than his target. It had no”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McQueen v. Swenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.