425 F. Supp. 890 - Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc. v. Weinberger’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2000 · most notably Heckler v. Chaney (1985), United States v. Hiland (1990)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 321 (§ 201 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (§ 301 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 332 (§ 302 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 355 (§ 505 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 371 (§ 701 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 821 (§ 301 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Preiser v. Newkirk · United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc. · Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. United States Atomic Energy Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that it would have a difficult time in court contending that a specific version (of an established drug) is a new drug within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 321(p) ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the clear statutory requirement of preclearance mandated by 21 U.S.C. Sec. 355”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.