Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 MASS 146 - Commonwealth v. Sexton

Commonwealth v. Sexton’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Tevlin (2001), Commonwealth v. Mattei (2010)

2 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions

1501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · Kelly v. United States · United States v. Murphy · Commonwealth v. Appleby · Commonwealth v. Farrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here is no need to prove an anticipatory compact between the parties to establish joint venture ... if, at the climactic moment the parties consciously acted together in carrying out the criminal endeavor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an instrument or instrumentality which, because of the manner in which it is used, or attempted to be used, endangers the life or inflicts great bodily harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “While we take issue with some of the reasoning in Shea , we do not necessarily disagree with the result the court reached in that case. In Shea , the danger posed by the ocean was not a result of the defendant bringing his victims into contact with that body of water, but rather the circumstances which followed when he deserted them, five miles from shore. We contrast this to a situation in which a defendant might drop his victim into a vat of acid, in which the mere contact with the substance would directly pose the risk of serious bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.