Griffiths v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2018
3 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mullins v. Pine Manor College · Mounsey v. Ellard · MacCormack v. Boston Edison Co. · Young v. Garwacki · Flood v. Southland Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[l]andlords may be liable for ignoring criminal activities that occur on [their] premises and were known or should have been known to them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]here must be limits to the scope or definition of reasonable foreseeability based on considerations of policy and pragmatic judgment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“plaintiff did not offer any evidence of prior shootings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.