State v. Stringfellow’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 2022
most recently cited
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dorsey v. State · United States v. Brown · Neusbaum v. State · Couser v. State · Foster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The jurors will be called upon to consider all of the evidence that is presented no matter who it is presented by. No matter what the person, the party is urging you to consider. Is there any member of the jury panel who would require trace evidence in order to accept a proposition presented by one of the parties? In other words, you say well, she didn’t present this or he didn’t present that.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“had Stringfellow preserved his objection, and assuming that propounding the pre-emptive 'anti-CSI effect' question was error, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, given the record of his trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“reiterated during jury instruction or other comments from the bench while the jury was present;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.