Coburn v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[MJost of the cases ... recognize that failure to give notice of an accident, or other lack of cooperation on the part of the insured, does not constitute a defense to an action by an injured member of the public to recover from the insurer, where the policy or bond was procured in compliance with a general compulsory liability or financial responsibility insurance statute, such statutes being for the benefit of members of the public, and not of the insured.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the noncooperation of the insured is not a good defense in an action between a third-party vietim and an insurer to the extent of the statutorily required minimum residual liability insurance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`to protect the members of the public at large from the ravages of automobile accidents.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.