Eckert v. Eckert’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2024
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. · Conrad v. Judson · Victory Park Apartments, Inc. v. Axelson · 205 Cal. App. 2d 818 - Pluth v. Smith · In Re Estate of Rider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The relevant inquiry is whether the partners intended that the property in question be partnership property or individual property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nelson v. Mattson“Property which is titled in the name of an individual partner may nevertheless be partnership property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nelson v. Mattson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.