Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 P2D 247 - Nichols v. State

Nichols v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
3
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2018

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

50196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Douglas v. People of State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fundamentally unfair and violative of the due process clause of article I, section 7 of the Alaska Constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside or correct the sentence ....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere may be made only before sentence is imposed or imposition of sentence is suspended; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his plea.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.