Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 P3D 592 - State v. Malone

State v. Malone’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · State v. Henderson · State v. Newell · State v. Schantz · State v. Christensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to corroborate the defendant's claims that he had a character trait of impulsivity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “were offered to demonstrate a brain condition that rendered it less likely”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “consistent with significant and permanent diffuse brain damage,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.