Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 SO2D 118 - State v. Harris

State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · McCarthy v. United States · Kastigar v. United States · Namet v. United States · United States v. Thevis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The former [use immunity] simply forbids the testimony given under the immunity grant to be used against the witness in any criminal prosecution of him; the latter [transactional immunity] provides the witness with immunity from prosecution for the matter concerning which his testimony was elicited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “As a federal constitutional matter, it is only necessary that a witness be given use immunity in order to compel his testimony”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a court of this state is powerless to provide a witness with transactional immunity over the State's objection”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.