Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 So. 2d 1241 - State v. David

425 So. 2d 1241 - State v. David’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

81 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably State v. Green (1995), 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque (1993)

81 state decisions

4301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A change of venue shall be granted when the applicant proves that by reason of prejudice existing in the public mind or because of undue influence, or that for any other reason, a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the parish where the prosecution is pending. In deciding whether to grant a change of venue the court shall consider whether the prejudice, the influence, or the other reasons are such that they will affect the answers of jurors on the voir dire examination or the testimony of witnesses at the trial.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to demonstrate the actual existence of such an opinion in the mind of the juror as will raise the presumption of partiality.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[U]nfairness of a constitutional magnitude will be presumed in the presence of a trial atmosphere which is utterly corrupted by press coverage or which is entirely lacking in the solemnity and sobriety to which a defendant is entitled in a system that subscribes to any notion of fairness and rejects the verdict of the mob.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.