EB Malone Corp. v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 389 So. 2d 1177 - Kerce v. Coca-Cola Company-Foods Division · 377 So. 2d 793 - Van Eyk v. RN Hicks Const. Co. · 418 So. 2d 1274 - Deltona Corp. v. Morris · 407 So. 2d 1026 - Santiago v. Orr Industries, Inc. · Gardner v. D. F. S. Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a), an employee who has sustained the loss of an arm, leg, hand, or foot, or total loss of use of such member because of organic damage to the nervous system, or has lost the sight of both eyes shall be paid temporary total disability of eighty percent of his average weekly wage... . In no event should the increased temporary total disability compensation provided for in this paragraph extend beyond six months from the date of injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“In the event the employee voluntarily limits his income or fails to accept employment commensurate with his abilities, the salary, wages, and other remuneration the employee is able to earn shall be deemed to be the amount which would have been earned if the employee did not limit his income or accepted appropriate employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“because of organic damage to the nervous system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.