Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 SO2D 847 - Cupit v. Grant

Cupit v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
October 1993
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 341 So. 2d 332 - Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. · 373 So. 2d 498 - Reck v. Stevens · Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. · Blanchard v. Ogima · 373 So. 2d 237 - Campbell v. Mouton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"On Motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the Court should consider all of the evidence—not just that evidence which supports the non-mover's case— but in the light and with all reasonable inferences most favorable to the party opposed to the motion. If the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the Court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, granting of the motions is proper. On the other hand, if there is substantial evidence opposed to the motions, that is, evidence of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded men in the exercise of impartial judgment might reach different conclusions, the motions should be denied, and the case submitted to the jury."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “There are three major requirements for the existence of a joint venture or partnership to be found. First, all the parties must consent to the formation of a partnership. Second, there must be a sharing of the losses of the venture as well as the profits. And last, each party must have some proprietary interest in, and be allowed to exercise some rights of control over, the business. 425 So.2d at 850 (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.