Ramos v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2009
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 388 So. 2d 377 - Dubroc v. Dubroc · 352 So. 2d 1013 - Halcomb v. Halcomb · 302 So. 2d 903 - Frederic v. Frederic · 401 So. 2d 552 - Bertrand v. Bertrand · Suire v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In order for an agreement between parents to modify the amount of child support to be enforceable, the parties must clearly agree to that modification, and the burden of proof is on the party relying on the agreement to relieve him of his obligation." (emphasis added)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The fact that a child is no longer living with the mother does not alter the rule that a judgment for child support remains in full force and effect in favor of the party to whom it was awarded, until the party liable applies to the court for modification, or unless the judgment is modified by conventional obligation. Bertrand v. Bertrand, 401 So.2d 552 (La.App. 3d Cir.1981); Dubroc v. Dubroc, supra.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sillis v. Hernandez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.