Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 425 SW3D 492 - Merlin James v. State

Merlin James v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 248th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Oyler v. Boles · Dickerson v. United States · Clayton v. State · Dewberry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) After notice to the defendant, a matter of form or substance in an indictment or information may be amended at any time before the date the trial on the merits commences. On the request of the defendant, the court shall allow the defendant not less than 10 days, or a shorter period if requested by the defendant, to respond to the amended indictment or information. (b) A matter of form or substance in an indictment or information may also be amended after the trial on the merits commences if the defendant does not object. (c) An indictment or information may not be amended over the defendant’s objection as to form or substance if the amended indictment or information charges the defendant with an additional or different offense or if the substantial rights of the defendant are prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.