Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

426 F.2d 310

Docket No. 24675.

United States v. Berumen

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-06-03

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1970

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Leary v. United States · United States v. Scott

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-06-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; John F. Kilkenny, Judge.

Robert L. Pippin, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Harry D. Stewart, U. S. Atty., Joseph A. Milchen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

¶2

We find no error in the court's ruling on the motion to suppress. The jury instructions given in the trial court were not objected to by defendant's counsel. We find no plain error in the instructions. Perhaps defendant might have had some supplemental instructions had he requested them, but he did not.

/426/f2d/310 · .json · Public domain