Parks v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
426 F.2d 610 · 1970
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2017
9 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1910
Relies on Block v. Hirsh · Crowley v. Christensen · Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter · United States v. Frankfort Distilleries, Inc. · Hornsby v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“allows the widest discretion and is subject to minimal demands of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process and equal protection requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spudich v. Smarr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.