Moormann v. Schriro’s Empirical Analysis
426 F.3d 1044 · 2005
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Robinson v. Schriro (2010), United States v. Withers (2010)
21 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Coleman v. Thompson · Stone v. Powell · Ring v. Arizona · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not exhaustively analyze each mitigating factor as long as a reviewing federal court can discern from the record that the state court did indeed consider all mitigating evidence offered by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spreitz v. Ryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.