426 N.J. Super. 475 - Jev v. Kv’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rendine v. Pantzer · 253 N.J. Super. 531 - Guglielmo v. Guglielmo · Miller v. Miller · Crews v. Crews · 251 N.J. Super. 169 - Fagas v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fees in family actions are normally awarded to permit parties with unequal financial positions to litigate (in good faith) on an equal footing. Anzalone v. Anzalone Bros., Inc. and Anzalone, 185 N.J.Super. 481, 486-87 [ 449 A.2d 1310 ] (App. Div. 1982). With the addition of bad faith as a consideration, it is also apparent that fees may be used to prevent a maliciously motivated party from inflicting economic damage on an opposing party by forcing expenditures for counsel fees. This purpose has a dual character since it sanctions a maliciously motivated position and indemnifies the “innocent” party from economic harm. Fagas v. Scott, 251 N.J.Super. 169, 194, 197-200 [ 597 A.2d 571 ] (Law Div.1991).] [Id. at 493, 45 A.3d 1001 .]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shorter-term marriages where permanent or rehabilitative alimony would be inappropriate or inapplicable but where, nonetheless, economic assistance for a limited period of time would be just.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“If the court determines that an award of permanent alimony is not warranted, the court shall make specific findings on the evidence setting out the reasons therefor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.