State v. Rome’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 68 Cal. 2d 280 - People v. Sorensen · Lyons v. Municipal Court for Central Judicial District · State v. Rome
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Parent’s criminal liability not relieved by other parent’s custody or support provided by others. This chapter may not be construed to relieve one parent from the criminal liability defined in § 25-7-16 for an omission because the other parent of the child is legally entitled to custody of the child nor because the other parent of the child, or any other person, or organization, voluntarily or involuntarily furnishes necessary food, clothing, shelter, medical attendance, other remedial care, or other means of support for the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taecker“(1) a parent who intentionally omits, (2) without lawful excuse, (3) to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, medical attendance, or other remedial care, or (4) other means of support, and (5) is absent from the state for more than thirty days.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taecker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.