426 Pa. Super. 410 - Commonwealth v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Klinghoffer · Commonwealth v. Hardcastle · Eckman v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Davis · Commonwealth v. Drum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test for determining the sufficiency of the evidence is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner and drawing all proper inferences favorable to the Commonwealth, the fact-finder could reasonably have determined all elements of the crime to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.