Rafkind v. Beer’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2008
1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sapp v. Warner · McDonald v. McGowan · Sickler v. Melbourne State Bank · Ruotal Corp., NW, Inc. v. Ottati · 95 So. 2d 506 - Chatlos v. McPherson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must suffer the consequence of his neglect.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n order to charge a person with notice of information which might have been learned by inquiry,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[w]ith the information [Ultra] possessed ..., it was incumbent upon [Ultra] to at least attempt to ascertain”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.