Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 426 SO2D 118 - State v. Narcisse

State v. Narcisse’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

186
cited by 186 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 182 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 186 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2019 · most notably McDougall v. North Carolina (1983), 805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver (2002)

1 federal appellate · 182 state decisions

7501983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Drope v. Missouri · State v. Sepulvado · Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The mere fact that a statute may be subsequently amended, after the commission of the crime, so as to modify or lessen the possible penalty to be imposed, does not extinguish liability for the offense committed under the former statute.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A. On its own motion the court may, and on request of a party the court shall, order that the witnesses be excluded from the courtroom or from a place where they can see or hear the proceedings, and refrain from discussing the facts of the case with anyone other than counsel in the case. In the interests of justice, the court may exempt any witness from its order of exclusion.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.