Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 A.2d 471 - State v. Allison

State v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2023

19 state decisions

11019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 91 Wis. 2d 134 - Holland v. State · United States v. Young · State v. Charette · State v. Lagasse · State v. Berube

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. A person may be guilty of a crime if it is committed by the conduct of another person for which he is legally accountable as provided in this section. 2. A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another person when: [[Image here]] C. He is an accomplice of such other person in the commission of the crime as provided in subsection 3. 3. A person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of a crime if: A. With the intent of promoting or facilitating the commission of the crime, he solicits such other person to commit the crime, or aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning or committing the crime. A person is an accomplice under this subsection to any crime the commission of which was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of his conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.