United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome Tremont’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
90 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Tremont v. United States (1970), United States v. Bernstein (1976)
90 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Tai v. United States · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · J. Gordon Turnbull, Inc. v. Commissioner · Boesche v. Udall · Kennedy v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he remedy of a new trial is sparingly used, and then only where there would be a 'miscarriage of justice . . . and where the evidence preponderates heavily against the verdict.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘The function of a bill of particulars is to protect against jeopardy, provide the accused with sufficient detail of the charges against him where necessary to the preparation- of his defense and to avoid prejudicial surprise at trial.’ (Emphasis added.) United States v. Leach, 427 F.2d 1107, 1110 (1st Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 829 , 91 S.Ct. 57 , 27 L. Ed.2d 59 (1970).” 322 A.2d at 330 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Wedge · State v. Maples“the making of a false statement in [an] application, knowing it to be false, for the purpose of obtaining a loan from the lending institution and influencing the FHA [HUD].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.