Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

427 F.2d 140

Docket No. 28698

United States v. Freeman

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1970.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1970-06-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1970

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312

Relies on Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Huth v. Southern Pacific Co. · Orser v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1970-06-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Summary Calendar.

¶2*141Bennett G. Feldman, Miami, Fla. (Ct. Apptd.), for appellant.

¶3Lloyd G. Bates, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for appellee.

¶4Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6This is an appeal from a Dyer Act conviction. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312.1 The evidence was more than ample to support the jury verdict of guilty. There was no error in the charge to the jury nor in the refusal to charge. See Orser v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 362 F.2d 580, 582, on the charge, and United States v. Sutton, 5 Cir., 1969, 411 F.2d 405, 406, on the elements of the offense.

¶7No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

/427/f2d/140 · .json · Public domain