United States v. Izzi’s Empirical Analysis
427 F.2d 293 · 1970
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably United States v. Jacobs (1973), State v. Harris (1992)
25 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on Gilbert v. California · Dombrowski v. Pfister · United States v. Kahaner · United States v. De Sisto · Boehm v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unexplained disappearance of carefully-handled, closely-guarded documents suffices to support an inference of theft.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.