Tri-cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Local 349’s Empirical Analysis
427 F.2d 325 · 1970
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 157 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co. (1988), Getty Oil Corporation, Succeeded by and a Division of Texaco, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North America (1988)
32 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Avco Corporation v. Aero Lodge No 735 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers · Murphy v. Houma Well Service · Sinclair Refining Co. v. Atkinson · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin · Huth v. Southern Pacific Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 157 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consistent with equity and good conscience”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“nominal or formal parties, being neither necessary nor indispensable, are not required to join in the petition for removal.” Tri-Cities Newspapers, Inc. v. Tri-Cities Printing Pressmen and Assistants’ Local 349, Int'l Printing Pressmen and Assistants Union of N.A., 427 F.2d 325 , 327 (5th Cir.1970).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he law is clear that under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), removal procedure requires that all defendants join in the removal petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.