Leo Anaya v. J. E. Baker, Warden’s Empirical Analysis
427 F.2d 73 · 1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2010
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · Wood v. United States · Wirtz v. I. C. Harris & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Tjhe defendant need not be ‘indigent’ but instead, when the defendant lacks the financial resources which would allow him to retain a competent criminal lawyer at the particular time he needs one he is entitled to appointed counsel.” (emphasis ours) 427 F.2d at 75 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brewer v. State · McCraw v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.