Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 F.3d 1020 - Maples v. Stegall

Maples v. Stegall’s Empirical Analysis

427 F.3d 1020 · 2005

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Watford (2006), United States v. Jackson (2007)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

160200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Hill v. Lockhart · United States v. Marion · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A delay approaching one year is presumptively prejudicial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affirmative proof of particularized prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.