Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 F.3d 419 - Korczak v. Sedeman

Korczak v. Sedeman’s Empirical Analysis

427 F.3d 419 · 2005

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2025

14 federal appellate ·

140200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Diamond v. Charles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “intervention can be and is used more broadly (or loosely) to denote a situation in which the resolution of a dispute can be expedited or made more accurate or otherwise improved by allowing someone to enter the litigation, conduct discovery, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and otherwise disport himself as a party would. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the intervenor does not have the kind of interest that confers standing, then, even if he is called a `party,' and even if he is a party for other purposes, he cannot force the litigation to judgment or take an appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]hether such participations are called `intervention' or something else, and the participants are called `parties' . . . or something else,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.