In Re Public Offering Ple Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Mack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. · Texaco Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Department of Consumer Affairs · Cusumano v. Microsoft Corp. · Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays International, Inc. · Bogosian v. Woloohojian Realty Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party .... For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action. Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cable v. Weinman“The IPO process was designed by underwriters for underwriters. You will not have a meaningful opportunity to negotiate so do not delude yourself on this front. The managing underwriter (without dissent from his co-managers) will present you with the results of their order book — a fait accompli as to pricing with perhaps a modest decision as to sizing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cable v. Weinman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.