Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 MASS 146 - In re Brown

In re Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
March 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2013

6 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Liteky et al United States · Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc. · In the Matter of Donohue · National Ass'n of Government Employees v. Labor Relations Commission · Matter of Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an exacting compact between judges and the citizenry. It is not enough that we know ourselves to be fair and impartial or that we believe this of our colleagues. Our power over our fellow citizens requires that we appear to be so as well. How else are ordinary citizens to have the faith in us ... ? An impartial manner, courtesy, and dignity are the outward sign of that fairness and impartiality we ask our fellow citizens, often in the most trying of circumstances, to believe we in fact possess. Surely it is arrogance for us to say to them that we may not seem impartial, but we know we are, and so they must submit. Precisely because the public cannot witness, but instead must trust, what happens when a judge retires to the privacy of his chambers, the judiciary must behave with circumspection when in the public eye.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “express what appears to be a strong animus against the union and its leadership.... Such accusations go far beyond any comment appropriate to the circumstances of this particular dispute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.