Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 So. 2d 1161 - State v. Freeman

427 So. 2d 1161 - State v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 612 So. 2d 191 - State v. Sparrow (1992), 605 So. 2d 702 - State v. Braswell (1992)

57 state decisions

2101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · 295 So. 2d 792 - State v. Patterson · State v. Landry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the non-homicide situation, the defense of self-defense requires a dual inquiry; an objective inquiry into whether the force used was reasonable under the circumstances; a subjective inquiry into whether the force was apparently necessary.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The use of force or violence upon the person of another is justifiable, when committed for the purpose of preventing a forcible offense against the person or a forcible offense or trespass against property in a person's lawful possession; provided that the force or violence used must be reasonable and apparently necessary to prevent such offense, and that this article shall not apply where the force or violence results in a homicide.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “It is clear that the statutes contemplate two different standards for two different situations. In the instance where no homicide results, as is the case here, the use of force or violence in self-defense is justified when the amount used is reasonable and it is apparently necessary to use such force to protect oneself. [14:19] On the other hand, when a homicide results from the use of force or violence, it is justified as self-defense only if the person reasonably believed he was in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that deadly force was necessary to save his life. [14:20].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.