Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 SO2D 174 - ORANGE COUNTY INDUS. DEVELOP. AUTH. v. State

ORANGE COUNTY INDUS. DEVELOP. AUTH. v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2012

9 state decisions

301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 307

Relies on Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission · Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee · Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting · Federal Communications Commission v. WNCN Listeners Guild

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Neither the state nor any county, school district, municipality, special district, or agency of any of them, shall become a joint owner with, or stockholder of, or give, lend or use its taxing power or credit to aid any corporation, association, partnership or person.... ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. State v. JEA · 510 F. Supp. 2d 691 - Jackson-Shaw Co. v. Jacksonville Aviation Authority
  2. “A broad, general public purpose ... will not constitutionally sustain a project that in terms of direct, actual use, is purely a private enterprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 604 So. 2d 440 - N. PALM BEACH CTY. WATER CONTROL v. State
  3. “if the public interest, even though indirect, is present and sufficiently strong,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. 604 So. 2d 440 - N. PALM BEACH CTY. WATER CONTROL v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.