Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 S.W.2d 621 - Campbell v. State

Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2001

4 state decisions

1019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 159 Tex. Crim. 520 - Dunn v. State · Manning v. State · Torres v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Further, the State would show that the Court Ordered the defendant herein to abide by certain conditions of community supervision during the term of community supervision and among the conditions ordered by the Court were the following: 1) Obey all orders of the Court and the Community Supervision Officer. 2) Commit no offense against the laws of this State or of any other State or of the United States. The State would further show to the Court that the said Defendant, during the period of Community Supervision, violated the terms and conditions of Community Supervision as follows: 1) The defendant, Harold Dean Willis, on or about the 18th day of March, 1997 in Brazos County, Texas did then and there intentionally, knowingly, and unlawfully appropriate property by acquiring and otherwise exercising control over property, other than real property, to-wit: fish hooks of the value of $1,500.00 or more but less than $20,000.00, from SNL Corporation, without the effective consent of Marc Snell, the owner thereof, and with intent to deprive said owner of said property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Willis v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.