Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 427 SW2D 703 - Perez v. Perez

Perez v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1974
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hanks v. Rosser · Lawrence v. Cananea Consol. Copper Co., S. A. · Davis v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no rule or statute in Texas requiring notice to be given of rendition of judgment when a case is taken under advisement. Enactment of such a «requirement may be considered salutary, and this case may well be thought to illustrate its need, but it is not our province to engraft the requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.