Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 F.2d 1027 - William M. Gilday, Jr. v. Palmer C. Scafati

William M. Gilday, Jr. v. Palmer C. Scafati’s Empirical Analysis

428 F.2d 1027 · 1970

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011 · most notably Loper v. Beto (1972), United States v. Weston (1971)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 16 states

57019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Griffin v. California · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Harrington v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We conclude that the Burgett rule against the use of uncounseled convictions ‘to prove guilt’ was intended to prohibit their use ‘to impeach credibility,’ for the obvious purpose and likely effect of impeaching the defendant’s credibility is to imply, if not prove, guilt ... we fail to discern any distinction which would allow such invalid convictions to be used to impeach credibility. The absence of counsel impairs the reliability of such convictions just as much when used to impeach as when direct proof of guilt.” Id.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.