Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 428 F.2d 1040 - Sendejas v. United States

Sendejas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

428 F.2d 1040 · 1970

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2004 · most notably Leyvas v. United States (1970), 6 Cal. 3d 562 - In Re Higbie (1972)

34 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

4201970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Jones v. United States · United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Palermo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is nothing as plain as the statute [i. e., the Jencks Act] in terms of stating that no pretrial statement in the possession of the government shall be subject to subpoena, discovery or inspection until the individual witness has testified on direct examination in the trial of the case and then only after proper motion by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Rule 16, F.R.P.C. deals generally with pre-trial discovery in a criminal case; however, as to demands for production of statements and reports of government witnesses other than defendants, 18 U.S.C. § 3500 (The Jencks Act) controls.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.