United States v. Four Star’s Empirical Analysis
428 F.2d 1406 · 1970
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 1999 · most notably United States v. Lemonakis (1973), United States v. Thomas (1973)
15 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Idaho Bankruptcy Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Coughlan v. United States · Schantz v. Eyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“takes advantage of its results violates professional ethics”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in-custody interrogation of an accused person known to be represented by counsel without affording counsel an opportunity to be present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.